[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ties between voices
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: ties between voices |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:34:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <carl.d.sorensen@gmail.com> writes:
> David,
>
> This notation will greatly simplify some of the choral music I set in
> the past year. I forgot about the discussion on the lists, and so
> didn't use it even though it was available. Thanks for making it work
>
> Aaron,
>
> I think this is a useful enough wrapper that it should be in the NR
> (and/or the LM). I would most likely use it just in sa or tb, since
> those are the voices that usually share a staff. This notation might
> actually reduce my use of \partcombine. I'll have to try it out.
My personal experience is that \partcombine is mainly useful for piano
extracts (or to some degree partitura mashing): boiling down material
without much of a view for voice relations. For choral music (and even
polyphonic piano music) I tend to prefer fixed voice relations.
--
David Kastrup
- ties between voices, David Zelinsky, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, Xavier Scheuer, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, David Kastrup, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, David Kastrup, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, Aaron Hill, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, David Kastrup, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices, Carl Sorensen, 2020/06/29
- Re[2]: ties between voices, Trevor, 2020/06/29
- Re: Re[2]: ties between voices, Carl Sorensen, 2020/06/29
- Re: ties between voices,
David Kastrup <=
Message not available
Re: ties between voices, David Zelinsky, 2020/06/30