Re: lilyglyphs.sty not found after upgrade to ubuntu 20.04

[bart deruyter]

Thanks for looking into it. 

Indeed, I installed it using synaptic.

Browsing in the ubuntu packages on: 

https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=focal&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=lilyglyphs.sty

I don't find it either in 'focal', but I do find it in 'eoan'. 

https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=eoan&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=lilyglyphs.sty

There I read it should be in the texlive-music package. 

Reading the description of 'texlive-music' in synaptic on my current system (20.04 or focal) lilyglyphs.sty is not mentioned either.

https://esmiltania.be
On Twitter
On Google+

Op do 2 jul. 2020 om 17:13 schreef Urs Liska <lists@openlilylib.org>:

Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2020, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > Am 2. Juli 2020 10:00:25 MESZ schrieb bart deruyter <
> > bart.deruyter@gmail.com>:
> > > Hi all,
> > > a bit off topic, but I thought maybe here someone would know
> > > something.
> > > I've recently upgraded to ubuntu 20.04 and tried to compile a
> > > luatex
> > > file
> > > containing lilypond material, using lyluatex and lilyglyphs.
> > >
> > > Now my system complains about 'lilyglyphs.sty not found'.
> > > I thought it would have been upgraded too, but it seems like it
> > > has
> > > been
> > > removed from the system and repositories all together. I don't
> > > find
> > > anything related to lilyglyphs in the repository.
> >
> > Thanks for the report. I don't know anything about it and will
> > investigate.
>
> How did you install LaTeX? I assume you are using TeX Live? The
> versions from the Ubuntu packages or the downloaded TeX Live?
>
> I assume you installed from the Ubuntu packages. If so, which actual
> packages did you install.
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/all/texlive-music/filelist
> indicates
> lilyglyphs is (still) in the texlive-music collection.
>
> Actually I'd be surprised if they had removed it. I'm aware of the
> possibility of compatibility issues, but I can't imagine they remove
> packages without warning/asking the maintainers first.

I just had a closer look and found that
a) lilyglyphs.sty is (now?) placed at tex/lualatex/lilyglyphs
which is somewhat strange and might xelatex not find it (I'm not sure,
but if you use lyluatex this can't be the issue anyway.

b)
I can't find lilyglyphs in the texlive package lists of Ubuntu and
Debian. I'll ask on the texlive mailing list.

Urs

>
> BestUrs
>
> > Urs
> >
> > > thanks,
> > > Bart
> > >
> > > https://esmiltania.be
> > > On Twitter <https://twitter.com/Bart_Issimo>
> > > On Google+ <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/116379400376517483499/>
>
>