[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: maple leaf rag mutopia
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: maple leaf rag mutopia |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:30:43 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> writes:
>> Always a bit of a risk to change the call signature of existing
>> exported functions. It may be called by more than just
>> \unfoldRepeats , with \applyMusic only being a somewhat weird old
>> use case.
>
> Ok. Do you have a better suggestion? Maybe a warning in
> `convert-ly`?
Frankly, my suggestion would be to make the call-signature of
unfold-repeats upwards compatible (optional argument comes last and is
actually optional). Of course at the cost of breaking every caller
introduced since the change.
--
David Kastrup
- maple leaf rag mutopia, Gianmaria Lari, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, David Kastrup, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, Gianmaria Lari, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, David Kastrup, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, David Kastrup, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/04/27
- Re: maple leaf rag mutopia,
David Kastrup <=