|
From: | Lukas-Fabian Moser |
Subject: | Re: Extending the width of a glissando |
Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:36:31 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
Hi Peter,
One thing puzzles me about the documentation when it comes to placement - it continually refers to the 'reference point' for an object. I sort of understand what it means, but it doesn't seem to be defined anywhere. For instance - to rotate a hairpin you have to specify the co-ordinates of the centre of rotation relative to its reference point. But where is the reference point for a hairpin? The start, the middle, the end? (The phrase is also used in other contests, such as octave placement in NR section 1.1.1, to add to the confusion).
If I understand it correctly, the "reference point" of a layout object should be its relative (0,0) coordinate. It is possible to display that point using a small function:
\version "2.23.4"But I'm a bit wary of the statement in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/rotating-objects.html#rotating-layout-objects that the .rotate property uses x/y-coordinates relative to the object's reference point. It rather seems to me (if I read grob.cc and stencil.cc in the source correctly) that the .rotation property uses the same coordinate system as ly:stencil-rotate does, namely
(0,0) = center of object
(-1,-1) = lower left corner
(1,1) = upper right corner.
This also explains the example regarding rotating hairpins: -1 0 is center-left (which also happens to be the reference point of a Hairpin).
(Of course, studying the effect of setting .rotation for a layout object is complicated by the fact that LilyPond's spacing engine might move the object around after rotating.)
Question to the experts: Am I right in thinking that the
documentation is misleading here?
Lukas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |