|
From: | Wol |
Subject: | Re: Windows laptop |
Date: | Sun, 13 Feb 2022 20:06:15 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.0 |
On 13/02/2022 18:35, David Zelinsky wrote:
If you'd been following the thread ... the whole point was the binaries wouldn't run on updated MacOS.Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> writes:On 13/02/2022 17:36, David Zelinsky wrote:Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk> writes:Oh - and the other route to consider, there always used to be Ubuntu Virtualbox or Vmware images of lilypond. Virtualbox is a freebie, and I think you can get free Vmware.Why would you need that? Just run lilypond natively in Ubuntu. (Or am I misunderstanding?)Sorry yes you are. The whole point of the suggestion is (1) run lilypond natively in Ubuntu, and (2) avoid shelling out for a new PC!I wholeheartedly agree with those points! But why would you need Virtualbox or VMware? Just install the binaries from lilypond.org.
That appears to be fixed, which was why I opened my original email with the comment that I hoped the information would be irrelevant ... :-) (but useful :-)
Cheers, Wol
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |