lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Opposite of Laissez Vibrer?


From: Paul Hodges
Subject: Re: Opposite of Laissez Vibrer?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:38:31 +0000

Perfect - Thank you!  I'd never have thought of looking there....

I can even use it for selected notes of a chord and control the directions individually.

Paul


From: Xavier Scheuer <x.scheuer@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hodges <pwh@cassland.org>
Cc: Lilypond-User Mailing List <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: 11/03/2022 11:12
Subject: Re: Opposite of Laissez Vibrer?

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 12:06, Paul Hodges <pwh@cassland.org> wrote:
>
> I need to set a passage for piano which consists of an extended melisma all of whose notes tie to a chord at the end.  As using actual ties would become an illegible mess, the composer wrote a laissez vibrer after each note, and then short "pickup" ties in front of the chord.   I can't see any obvious way to write these, other than writing each as a tie from the original note and then shortening them all with a shape for each one - which would be tedious, messy, and non-robust (as the parameters would need to be adjusted every time the layout of the score was adjusted).
>
> Is there a better way?

Hello,

\repeatTie ?

See NR 1.2.1 Writing rhythms > Ties

Cheers,
Xavier

--
Xavier Scheuer <x.scheuer@gmail.com>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]