lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Expressive marks


From: Mario Bolognani
Subject: Re: Expressive marks
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 19:11:58 +0200

Many thanks Richard for your suggestion. I’ll try to understand.

Best

Mario

Inviato da iPhone

> Il giorno 13 mag 2022, alle ore 14:58, Richard Shann 
> <richard@rshann.plus.com> ha scritto:
> 
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 14:06 +0200, Stephan Schöll wrote:
>> I'm wondering if we need 340 lines of Scheme code or if we could /
>> why we can't use the TrillSpanner and just eliminate the "tr" prefix
>> and leave the wiggy line,
> 
> yes, that's good if you want exactly that wiggley line - the 340 lines
> of scheme code let you control the amplitude and frequency of the
> wiggles (and even modulate these as the line progresses IIRC), which
> can be important when matching early printed scores.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
>> something based on (but not working since I don't understand Scheme
>> lists thoroughly):
>> \relative c'' {
>>    \once \override TrillSpanner.bound-details = '((left (text
>> #<procedure musicglyph-markup (layout props glyph-name)>
>>                "scripts.trill")
>>          (stencil-offset -0.5 . -1)
>>          (padding . 0.5)
>>          (attach-dir . 0))
>>          (left-broken (end-on-note . #t))
>>          (right))
>>    
>>    e8\startTrillSpan e c c s\stopTrillSpan
>>  }
>> ... and simply replacing "scripts.trill" with an empty string or
>> void/null ...
>> 
>> Am 13.05.2022 um 09:37 schrieb Richard Shann:
>>> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 09:12 +0200, Mario Bolognani wrote:
>>>  
>>> Any idea on how to obtain this kind of expressive marks?
>> There is a thread about this which I was involved in, the code that
>> resulted is here in Denemo's source LilyPond files:
>> 
>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=denemo.git;a=blob;f=actions/lilypond/vibrato.ily;h=dadedd6859563a0bac0629b19ac729111ced29bd;hb=HEAD
>>  
>> 
>> from where you can pick it up and use it in raw LilyPond scores.
>> 
>> Richard Shann
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> 
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]