[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \time 9/8 (3/4)
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: \time 9/8 (3/4) |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 2022 15:32:48 +0200 |
> On 29 Jul 2022, at 15:14, Paul Hodges <pwh@cassland.org> wrote:
>
> From: Hans Åberg <haberg-1@telia.com>
>
> There is also the practise to write the triplet markers just a few bars, and
> then skipping them. Perhaps for simplifying handwriting and helping then
> engraver in the days this was done by hand, so would not be needed nowadays
> when done electronically.
>
> Not needed maybe, but in some contexts actually easier to read in my view.
For a Leventikos, like Egejki Majki, I use
\time 3,2,2,3,2 12/8
\override TupletNumber.text = #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text
which has duplets on the 3s, I use this first:
\once \override TupletNumber.text =
#(tuplet-number::fraction-with-notes (ly:make-duration 2 0) (ly:make-duration
2 1))
\tuplet 2/3 {f16 g a d,} …
to get small notes added. And then
\tuplet 2/3 {f16 g a c,} …
just writes numbers over. I get small hooks over
\times 2/3 {f4\trill~f8} …
It does not look so intrusive.
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), (continued)
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Carl Sorensen, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), address@hidden, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), David Kastrup, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Kieren MacMillan, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Wol, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), David Kastrup, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Eef Weenink, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Hans Åberg, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Paul Hodges, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4),
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Hans Åberg, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Kieren MacMillan, 2022/07/29
- Re: \time 9/8 (3/4), Hans Åberg, 2022/07/29