Re: polychords: what's the current state-of-the-art?

[David Kastrup]

Kieren MacMillan <kieren@kierenmacmillan.info> writes:

> Hi all,
>
>>> convert-ly exists.
>> I actually thought I had tried this. Obviously I was too stupid to
>> do it correctly.
>
> Me, too, I guess…? At least in Frescobaldi, it didn't work at all [!!].

Running the given file through convert-ly changes the respective lines
in the example code (and bumps the version to 2.20.0 I think).

That's the entry part of this snippet.  Whether the analysis part would
also be affected, I have no clue.  If so, convert-ly would have no
chance of fixing it.  But convert-ly appears to deal with the samples
Lukas discussed.

-- 
David Kastrup