lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: polychords: what's the current state-of-the-art?


From: Lukas-Fabian Moser
Subject: Re: polychords: what's the current state-of-the-art?
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 10:22:51 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

Hi Kieren,

What's the current best snippet for rendering polychords? I know the GSoC chord stuff is still in air traffic control, but the snippet found at <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-02/txtmAr2kxZ1Uy.txt> definitely doesn't work, and is likely far from optimal given the decade-plus of advances in the codebase.

I don't have much time at the moment, but as a first pointer:

The snippet worked as late as 2.18.2. What broke it after that is that the meaning of c1:5.9-.11.13- in chordmode has changed:

\version "2.18.2"

\chordmode {
  c1:5.9-.11.13-
}

yields

in 2.18.2, whereas in 2.19.83, it yields

The culprit seems to be the added support for power chords: In 2.18.2, c1:5 generated a c major chord; now it only generates a power chord fifth. My guess would be that Valentin V.'s chord name cleanup in 78225bc1b386e12dc was the point when this changed.

Lukas


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]