Re: Future of OpenLilyLib

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

Am 21.11.22 um 23:28 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:

> One would add a new keyword in the parser akin to \include
> (\import? \load?). 

How about \require?

> ... module code ...
>
> \endModule % or whatever name
>
> ... example ...
>
>
> where \endModule would act as a "trap" interrupting the parsing,
> but only if the file is included. If the file is compiled as
> main, it would continue parsing, and after \endModule you could
> put some examples and tests for the snippet / module functionality.

That is how module documentation in TeX works (as you are probably 
aware). I don’t think many users would look into that, esp. since 
LilyPond’s documentation is more concise and centralized.

Otherwise I’ll leave this discussion to you, since I never need the more 
sophisticated features of LilyPond for my folk songs and odd other piece.

Thank you for your work!

Hraban