[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback request on image formats
From: |
Benjamin Tordoff |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback request on image formats |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 06:40:54 +0000 |
Almost all the images I use for cover art etc are JPEG or PNG originally so for
me PNG is the most important format. Other images I use are generally icons or
clip art and these are almost always png or svg. I don’t think I’ve ever seen
stock imagery or icons in pdf format, only documents.
So, +1 for SVG (+PNG obviously) from me.
Ben
> On 10 Jan 2023, at 22:52, Stephan Schöll <music@gmx.ch> wrote:
>
> +1 for SVG:
> From my perspective and experience including vector graphics in musical
> scores is most often about icons or graphics, illustration or extended
> markup, but rather not entire documents / pages (knowing that PDFs can
> be small as well of course ;-).
> SVG is widely used for icons and graphics of any dimension (and scalable
> by definition ;-) ), while PDF contains a lot of overhead that might
> cause trouble "easier".
>
> And yes: PNG is welcome as well :-)
>
> Best Stephan
>
>> On 10.01.2023 23:35, Abraham Lee wrote:
>> If I had a vote, and if PDF really can be seamlessly converted, I would
>> make the front-end favor the SVG format as I think that format would be
>> more likely used by most users.
>>
>> Glad to hear about this! Both PNG and SVG would be very nice additions.
>>
>> Best,
>> Abraham
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:23 PM Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr
>> <mailto:jean@abou-samra.fr>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a little call for feedback, especially from users of the
>> \epsfile
>> markup command. (To be clear, I'm not speaking "in the name of the
>> development
>> team", just in my name.)
>>
>> Over the past year and a half, LilyPond has gained a new output
>> backend based on the Cairo graphics library. While this backend
>> has many advantages, there's a downside: it is not possible with
>> Cairo to include EPS files in PDF output. Yet this is the only way
>> today to include images, via the \epsfile markup command.
>>
>> To address this limitation, we're considering adding support for more
>> image formats than EPS. We will likely add PNG. However, because PNG
>> is a raster graphics format while EPS can contain vector graphics
>> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_graphics
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_graphics>), we'd like to add a
>> vector graphics format as well. Basically, the contenders are PDF
>> and SVG. However, each of them requires adding dependencies, so we'd
>> rather not have them both.
>>
>> Which leads to the question in this straw poll: would it be more useful
>> for you to be able to insert SVG or PDF images? Keep in mind that both
>> can be converted into each other seamlessly, so the question is mainly
>> what will be most useful for a majority of people.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jean
>>
>