Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests

[David Kastrup]

Valentin Petzel <valentin@petzel.at> writes:

>> The lower voice could not possibly be autobeamed anyway since it starts
>> behind the beat.  You need to add all of the skips manually, and I don't
>> think that adding the single beam you want would be enough effort to
>> warrant autobeaming.
>
> Why would this be so? Lilypond does not have issues autobeaming
> { s16 16 16 16}
> for example.

Cannot reproduce what I had been thinking of.  Possibly addressed by
some previous autobeaming change.

-- 
David Kastrup