Re: autobeaming over rests,Re: autobeaming over rests

[Mark Knoop]

At 10:27 on 29 Jan 2023, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Hello Werner,

> this would not be hard to get done. Here’s an experimental commit:

> https://gitlab.com/vpetzel/lilypond/-/commit/5267b574d27316b7c5d45080b32200dabc5d37dc[1]

> Using this test:

> {
>   c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break
>   \set autoBeamRests = ##t
>   c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break
>   \set autoBeamRests = ##f \set autoBeamSkips = ##t
>   c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s \break
>   \set autoBeamRests = ##t
>   c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c'' | r r r r s s s s
> }

> this produces the appended result.
> Valentin

This is great! It would be nice if there were an option to beam only
over *enclosed* rests/spaces, i.e.

c'8 d' r e' r f' g' r | r r r a' b' s s c''

would result in:

c'8[ d' r e'] r f'[ g'] r | r r r a'\noBeam b'[ s s c'']

Could this be possible?

--
Mark Knoop