[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout
From: |
Chip Salzenberg |
Subject: |
Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:12:57 -0500 |
According to Jeff Kingston:
> Rather than delving into the technical issues, these
> committees look for evidence that other people value
> whatever it is.
I'm a professional programming instructor, and I chose lout to
create my materials. I've been pleased with this choice.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <address@hidden>
"When do you work?" "Whenever I'm not busy."
- evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Jeff Kingston, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, David Oxilia, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, John Keith Hohm, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout,
Chip Salzenberg <=
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Chip Salzenberg, 1999/03/24
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Alex Povolotsky, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Daren Scot Wilson, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Wolfram Kahl, 1999/03/25
- Re: evidence for the quality/impact of Lout, Dale Arntson, 1999/03/25