[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: References to web sites
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: References to web sites |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:11:03 +1100 |
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 23:29:21 +0100 (MET), Robert Feldt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Jeff Kingston wrote:
>
> > I think you should use the type of whatever document is at the end
> > of the link: tech report, journal article, etc. The fact that a
> > document is accessed via a URL rather than by wandering over to the
> > library and grabbing a journal does not affect what type of document
> > it is.
> >
> But the thing is that there is no "document" at the end of the link. Only
> the page itself.
OK, so if you printed that page out on a sheet of paper, what would
its type be? There are all kinds of types of documents on the web:
technical reports, journal articles, software for download, etc.
A quick grep of data/refstyle.ld shows that Lout's standard distribution
offers the following document types:
{ Book @RefStyle @Style
{ Proceedings @RefStyle @Style
{ PhDThesis @RefStyle @Style
{ TechReport @RefStyle @Style
{ MastersThesis @RefStyle @Style
{ Seminar @RefStyle @Style
{ Misc @RefStyle @Style
{ Article @RefStyle @Style
{ InBook @RefStyle @Style
{ InProceedings @RefStyle @Style
If the web page you are referencing really can't be classified more
precisely than "Web Page", I suggest you use Misc. If it has a
better classification, then we need to develop that into another
@RefStyle.
Jeff Kingston