Re: pagenumbers and the -s (no cross references) option

[Jürgen H . Havix]

Hello,
for me the problem seems to be the vertical spacing of the pagenumber,
not the (horz.) width of the number.
Would it be hard to take the formatting of the running header
from the setup-file for the quick run?
George

> Hi,
>
> address@hidden writes:
>
>> Since Lout is otherwise a relatively principled affair,
>> one should give this another try ---
>> perhaps at least use very small, bold "??",
>> so that in most cases they end up being not larger than the final thing.
>
> The problem is that the "final thing", a page number here, can be as
> narrow as "1" or as wide as "777", which makes it hard to predict how
> much room is needed.  The problem is even worse when one uses a font
> with "hanging figures" [0] I guess.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludovic.
>
> [0] http://www.fonts.com/AboutFonts/Articles/fyti/OldstyleFigs.htm
>