Re: Changing math layout / microtypography

[Matěj Cepl]

On 2016-04-02, 00:10 GMT, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> So, I want to try lout again, thinking that complex stuff can 
> be typeset in much less time than using LaTeX.  The drawback 
> in typography I want to limit by adapting some 
> microtypographical enhancements to the way, lout doe sthe 
> typesetting. 

I think that the limitation is that lout is very much tighten to 
PostScript. So, as long as you can express it in PostScript (and 
your ps2pdf won't screw up), I believe you can make Lout macro 
which will generate the stuff for you. Which makes me wonder: 
most of the microtypographical extensions to TeX came with 
PDFTeX I believe and you still need it or its descendants (e.g., 
XeTeX) to get them. But perhaps I am wrong, and you can do those 
microtypographical extensions with PostScript as well, and it 
was just a coincidence that it came with PDFTeX.

Best,

Matěj

-- 
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: address@hidden
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
 
We are told that [St. Anthony] once fell into dejection, finding
uninterrupted contemplation above his strength; but was taught to
apply himself at intervals to manual labour by a vision of an
angel who appeared platting mats of palm-tree leaves, then rising
to pray, and after some time sitting down again to work; and who
at length said to him, "Do thus, and thou shalt be saved."
    -- Life of St. Anthony