[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ltib] httpd versus boa?
From: |
Stuart Hughes |
Subject: |
Re: [Ltib] httpd versus boa? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:27:53 +0000 |
Hi Robert,
I've minimally used boa and it seems to work okay. There's a test page
and a simple shell cgi test in the rootfs
(rootfs/var/www/cgi-bin/test_cgi).
Regards, Stuart
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 15:17 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> a general opinion question -- i've been handed a working LTIB setup
> that contains httpd-2.0.54. personally, i'd prefer to use the much
> smaller boa, so a couple questions:
>
> 1) all we need the webserver to do is support simple forms to
> upload/download files and simple CGI scripts. are there any crippling
> shortfalls with boa that folks have run into as compared to httpd?
>
> 2) just for the entertainment value, has anyone crammed an upgraded
> httpd-2.2.11 into ltib? did it work? was it difficult? i'm just
> curious.
>
> rday
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day
> Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
> Have classroom, will lecture.
>
> http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
> ========================================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://bitshrine.org
>
> Ltib mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib