Re: [Ltib] Any newer bluez support than 2.25?

[Stuart Hughes]

Hi Peter,

IIRC that particular version is used because it was the last one
that doesn't depend on dbus.  Although I can understand it could
be good to have a later bluez available, I'm not yet sure it should
be the default.  So for now, if you make a new spec file, call it
something like bluez-x.y.spec.  Also remember to build dbus.

Regards, Stuart

--- address@hidden wrote:

From: Peter Barada <address@hidden>
To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Subject: [Ltib] Any newer bluez support than 2.25?
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:26:47 -0400

The bluez-2.25 package in LTIB is no longer supported by bluez.org -
does anyone have packages/patches/spec files for a newer version (4.33?)

-- 
Peter Barada <address@hidden>


_______________________________________________
LTIB home page: http://bitshrine.org

Ltib mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib