ltib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltib] Any newer bluez support than 2.25?


From: Stuart Hughes
Subject: Re: [Ltib] Any newer bluez support than 2.25?
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:13:58 -0700

--- address@hidden wrote:

From: Peter Barada <address@hidden>
To: Stuart Hughes <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Ltib] Any newer bluez support than 2.25?
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:07:37 -0400

On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:49 -0400, Peter Barada wrote:
[snip]
`/home/peter/work/logic/omap/svn/products/linux/LTIB/logic/ltib/rpm/BUILD/dbus-1.2.12'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status
> from 
> /home/peter/work/logic/omap/svn/products/linux/LTIB/logic/ltib/tmp/rpm-tmp.34740
>  (%build)
> 
> 
> And yes, there are .la files in rpm/BUILD/dbus-1.1.12/ that have
> "libdir='/usr/lib'".  What's the best way to fix this so the .la files
> don't look in /usr/lib?


I followed the workaround you suggested from gtk2.spec, and that works.
Now bluez-4.3.3 is looking for glib2.  What is getting scary is the
rampup in footprint to include expat, dbus, glib2 to get bluez-4.33 to
build.  I haven't het collected numbers, but I'm not sure its going to
be viable for an embedded system...

Hi Peter,

Yes, that's often the downside of later packages (the plate of
spaghetti dependency effect).  BTW: note that if you enabled
say expat from ./ltib -m config, it will also enable and 
dependent package such as glib.

Regards, Stuart




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]