[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] architecture question
From: |
Peter Graf |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] RE: [lwip] architecture question |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 23:08:51 -0000 |
Hi Andy,
>I am running lwIP on a PowerPC 850 platform, 32 bit, big endian.
>We communicate over ethernet using the built in serial comms capabilities of
>the processor.
Are you using the "sioslipif" SLIP driver, like me?
Or does your interface rather look like ethernet to lwIP?
>I am using the 'raw' API as we do not have a multi tasking OS.
I used the multitasking API. Maybe additional problems there, but even ICMP
(no API used) doesn't work any longer.
>I wonder if your problem could be the same as one I had last week:
>Moving from 0.4.1 to 0.5.0 I didn't get any ACKs from lwip when sending
>small TCP segments. I guess that ICMP packets may have the same problem.
Sounds possible.
>Here's Adam's off-list response to me which may help:
>[snip]
Thanks. It was about the TCP timers not being called, because you (unlike
me) don't include the multitasking API. Had Adam's suggestion cured your
problem?
All the best
Peter
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Peter Graf, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] architecture question, Andy Knox, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] architecture question,
Peter Graf <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Horst Garnetzke, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] architecture question, Florian Schulze, 2003/01/09