[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use
From: |
James Roth |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:28:17 -0000 |
--------------010204040002030904010002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Kieran Mansley wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, James Roth wrote:
>
>>I increased mem pool #8 so that it no longer runs out.
>>
>>Ok, I turned on stats. For about the first 5600 hits, the stats for
>>memp #4 look like this:
>>
>> m->avail: 8
>> m->used: 2
>> m->max: 2
>> m->err: 0
>> m->reclaimed: 0
>>
>>Then, suddenly:
>>
>> m->avail: 8
>> m->used: 7
>> m->max: 8
>> m->err: 3
>> m->reclaimed: 0
>>
>>and boom. It never recovers. This always happens about 700 seconds
>>after booting. A sudden increase of 2 or less m->used to more than 8.
>> Hmmm....
>>
>
>Perhaps the application has just opened a large number of listening
>connections?
>
>However, the m->err: 3 suggests there is something wrong somewhere. If
>you could work out what was causing these errors you'll probably find your
>problem. Should be reasonably easy to track down if you're able to use
>some of the tracing (and turning on tracing doesn't make the error
>evaporate!)
>
>Kieran
>
I increased the pool size to 32 for memp #4. Now m->err stays at 0
forever. But, the same problem happens: 700 secs / 5600 hits. So, memp
does not appear to be my real problem. After failure, the board does
not respond to pings either. I will turn on more debug messages and
keep looking.
Did anyone get unixsim to work with the 2.4 linux kernel? I would
like to try heavy testing under linux.
>
>[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
>
--
James Roth <address@hidden>
Shugyo Design Technologies
http://www.shugyodesign.com/
--------------010204040002030904010002
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
Kieran Mansley wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:address@hidden">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, James Roth wrote:<br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I increased mem pool #8 so that it no longer runs
out.<br><br>Ok, I turned on stats. For about the first 5600 hits, the stats
for<br>memp #4 look like this:<br><br> m->avail: 8<br> m->used:
2<br> m->max: 2<br> m->err: 0<br> m->reclaimed:
0<br><br>Then, suddenly:<br><br> m->avail: 8<br> m->used: 7<br>
m->max: 8<br> m->err: 3<br> m->reclaimed: 0<br><br>and boom. It
never recovers. This always happens about 700 seconds<br>after booting. A
sudden increase of 2 or less m->used to more than 8.<br> Hmmm....<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----><br>Perhaps the application has just opened a large
number of listening<br>connections?<br><br>However, the m->err: 3 suggests
there is something wrong somewhere. If<br>you could work out what was causing
these errors you'll probably find your<br>problem. Should be reasonably easy
to track down if you're able to use<br>some of the tracing (and turning on
tracing doesn't make the error<br>evaporate!)<br><br>Kieran<br></pre>
</blockquote>
I increased the pool size to 32 for memp #4. Now
m->err stays at
0 forever. But, the same problem happens: 700 secs / 5600 hits. So,
memp
does not appear to be my real problem. After failure, the board does not
respond to pings either. I will turn on more debug messages and keep
looking.<br>
<br>
Did anyone get unixsim to work with the 2.4 linux kernel?
I would like
to try heavy testing under linux.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:address@hidden">
<pre wrap=""><br>[This message was sent through the lwip discussion
list.]<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="$mailwrapcol">--
James Roth <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>
Shugyo Design Technologies
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.shugyodesign.com/">http://www.shugyodesign.com/</a>
</pre>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------010204040002030904010002--
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Paul Sheer, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use,
James Roth <=
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, Kieran Mansley, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, James Roth, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] lwIP 0.5.2 under heavy use, James Roth, 2003/01/09