[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventual
From: |
Adam Dunkels |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:39:23 -0000 |
Hi!
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 20:08, Scott Robinson wrote:
> I think he meant renaming the file names themselves.
Ooops, of course... :-P
What do you others think about renaming the files? I don't see any major
problems with doing so, especially if it increases portability. The only
other files with names longer than 8.3 is ethernetif.{c,h} and
sioslipif.{c,h} which will be renamed anyway.
/adam
--
Adam Dunkels <address@hidden>
http://www.sics.se/~adam/
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, Jani Monoses, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, address@hidden, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, Rod Boyce, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, Scott Robinson, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, Scott Robinson, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f,
Adam Dunkels <=
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, Adam Dunkels, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] File structure regarding sioslipif and eventually pppi f, Scott Robinson, 2003/01/09