[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf
From: |
Duncan Palmer |
Subject: |
[lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:11:29 -0000 |
On Friday 06 September 2002 00:00, Recker, John wrote:
> I personally think that the biggest future growth
> opportunity for embedded devices running TCP/IP
> is in ad-hoc networks as opposed to managed networks
> with servers running DHCP.
I agree. We are running a UPnP stack on top of LWIP in a consumer device, and
are doing a lot of work on in-home networks, which is very much an ad-hoc
environment...
>
> I sure know that I don't like that I have to be a
> system manager to keep my increasingly complex
> networked environment running at home, and I'm sure
> my Mom won't either! ;)
>
> jr
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:49 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [lwip] zeroconf
>
>
> Hello,
>
> yes, I have considered implementing zeroconf and have read the Apple
> announcement about them open-sourcing their implementation. (It's already
> available AFAIK).
>
> I do not have time to implement it myself at this moment, but I will
> certainly assist in any way I can if someone else is starting this.
>
> The real question is whether zeroconf will be an upcoming technique in
> embedded device networks?
>
> Regards,
>
> Leon.
[This message was sent through the lwip discussion list.]
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf, Duncan Palmer, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf, leon . woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] zeroconf, Recker, John, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/08
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf, leon . woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf, Leon Woestenberg, 2003/01/09
- [lwip-users] Re: [lwip] zeroconf,
Duncan Palmer <=
- [lwip-users] RE: [lwip] zeroconf, Recker, John, 2003/01/09