[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Win32 vs. PACK_STRUCT_BEGIN
From: |
Jani Monoses |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Win32 vs. PACK_STRUCT_BEGIN |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:45:28 +0200 |
But this is the way it is done now in CVS.
Are you looking at 0.5.3?
> I am planning on using lwIP to add tcp/ip connectivity to an embedded
> system. The system is x86 based, and runs a homebrew kernel which is a
> (small) subset of Win32. I use the Microsoft Visual C++ compiler and tools
> to build my executable.
>
> I have begun working with the source to see how much effort it will be to
> port over. I have run into PACK_STRUCT_BEGIN / PACK_STRUCT_END issue.
> Microsoft themselves handle this using the include file trick. I know that
> it is ugly, but is really the only way to handle it (other than putting
> #ifdefs in the code). You could avoid breaking existing usages of the
> package as follows:
>
> in arch\cc.c:
>
> #define PACK_NEEDS_INCLUDES // define only in ARCH's that need it
>
> in ip_addr.h and similar locations:
>
> #ifdef PACK_NEEDS_INCLUDES
> #include "arch\pack_begin_struct.h"
> #endif
>
> PACK_BEGIN_STRUCT
> struct ip_addr {
> ...
> } PACK_STRUCT_STRUCT;
> PACK_END_STRUCT
>
> #ifdef PACK_NEEDS_INCLUDES
> #include "arch\pack_end_struct.h"
> #endif
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users