[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit
From: |
Sam Jansen |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:59:56 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 |
K.J. Mansley wrote:
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 11:28, K.J. Mansley wrote:
I've had another look, and there seems to be a number of things that
aren't quite right.
> The answer would seem to be that when tcp_rexmit is called from the
> fast retransmit code, it moves *all* unacked segments to the unsent
> queue, which will mean *all* unacked segments are retransmitted. This
> is not what should happen.
This is the conclusion I came to when looking at the code. I was
unfamiliar enough with the code to not be sure though.
> <snip>
I've implemented these changes, but I'm not in a position to test it,
and it's the sort of thing that could have unforeseen effects. If I
check this in, would anyone (perhaps Sam Jansen?) be willing to have
another look over it and make sure it's behaving properly?
Yeah, I'll check out CVS later today and have a look.
Also, if anyone has objections to this change, speak now!
Sounds good to me.
--
Sam Jansen address@hidden
Wand Network Research Group http://www.wand.net.nz/~stj2
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, Sam Jansen, 2004/07/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, K.J. Mansley, 2004/07/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, K.J. Mansley, 2004/07/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, K.J. Mansley, 2004/07/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/07/13
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, K.J. Mansley, 2004/07/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, Sam Jansen, 2004/07/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, Leon Woestenberg, 2004/07/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, Sam Jansen, 2004/07/14
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit, K.J. Mansley, 2004/07/15
- Re: [lwip-users] Fast retransmit,
Sam Jansen <=