Re: [lwip-users] Sys_timeouts

[Mumtaz Ahmad]

Its bsd style socket api .Instead of comparing the current implementation
with mine in terms of speed i would like them to be compared interms of
simplicity.
I think the current lwip bsd api layer is complex. But thats my thinking and
i may be wrong . The crux is that by implementing my own layer i have got
more control and faith in lwip core .

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Goldschmidt Simon" <address@hidden>
To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: [lwip-users] Sys_timeouts


>
> > Though it takes time to make your own Sequential API layer
> > but it gives you choice to make a robust interface depending
> > on your needs and requirements.
> > I dont know but its my feeling that current sequential
> > interface is a bit slow ,i may be wrong . By implementing my
> > own layer i have achieved more than 40Mbps full duplex
> > communication with windows and linux servers on a 100 Mbps
>
> Hm, that's interesting! What kind of API did you implement?
> A socket-like API? And do you have any idea how fast your
> platform is with the lwip-socket API?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users