Re: [lwip-users] Re: lwip-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 27

[Simon Goldschmidt]

I'm afraid I don't understand your question. :-(

Simon


 Li Eugene <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
>> I think that was a typo and Kieran meant TCP_SND_BUF (the send queue limit 
>> in bytes). You might have to change TCP_SND_QUEUELEN (the send queue limit 
>> in pbufs), too.
> Simon, 
> 
> Could you explain why actual size of the queue is a half of what defined. For 
> example #define TCP_WND 1536 than queue of pbufs will link up to 768 bytes. 
> 
> If request is longer than queue will link 768 bytes in pbufs however the rest 
> of the request will be in pbufs just not linked?
> 
> I've given up myself to resolve it - just wasting precious memory at the 
> moment.
> 
> Many thanks
> Eugene
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users