lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] Re: lwip-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 27


From: Li Eugene
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Re: lwip-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 27
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:46:35 +0000

I mean that returned payload is limited to a half of what is defined by TCP_WND. If request is longer than a half of TCP_WND - the rest of it will be dropped and not linked in returned payload.

It may happens only in my case however, which is freertos + lwip + mcf51cn

many thanks
Eugene

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Simon Goldschmidt <address@hidden> wrote:
I'm afraid I don't understand your question. :-(

Simon


 Li Eugene <address@hidden> wrote:

>
>> I think that was a typo and Kieran meant TCP_SND_BUF (the send queue limit in bytes). You might have to change TCP_SND_QUEUELEN (the send queue limit in pbufs), too.
> Simon,
>
> Could you explain why actual size of the queue is a half of what defined. For example #define TCP_WND 1536 than queue of pbufs will link up to 768 bytes.
>
> If request is longer than queue will link 768 bytes in pbufs however the rest of the request will be in pbufs just not linked?
>
> I've given up myself to resolve it - just wasting precious memory at the moment.
>
> Many thanks
> Eugene
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]