[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal
From: |
Sylvain Rochet |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:10:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi Ajay,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 07:38:16AM +0530, Ajay Garg wrote:
>
> In the application that we have designed and coded so far, everything has
> been kept single-threaded only (so as now to have any dependency on any
> third-party embedded-device-vendors).
>
> So, it turns out, that we "do" need to use NO_SYS = 1
>
> But I get your point, it should be feasible to integrate the functionality
> with NO_SYS = 1 (though it might require some code-rearrangement in lwIP).
code-rearrangement *in* lwIP ? lwIP is fully designed to work with
NO_SYS = 1. Actually lwIP was first designed to work without an OS and
was next reworked to run in its own thread using a simple callback
through message box mechanism to keep it lightweight.
> Anyhow, if there are some examples of this particular scenario (NO_SYS = 1,
> everything within the main loop), kindly let know. It would save some time
> ticks for us :)
Again, lwIP contrib Git (and/or lwIP contrib releases) is more than
complete with comprehensive NO_SYS=0 and NO_SYS=1 examples.
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Ajay Garg, 2015/08/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Sylvain Rochet, 2015/08/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Ajay Garg, 2015/08/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Sylvain Rochet, 2015/08/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Ajay Garg, 2015/08/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Ajay Garg, 2015/08/22
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Ajay Garg, 2015/08/23
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal, Sylvain Rochet, 2015/08/23
- Re: [lwip-users] TCP/IP/PPP for bare-metal,
Sylvain Rochet <=