Re: [m17n-list] Issues in ne-trad and ne-rom

[K. Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Santosh Pradhan <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello m17n contributers,
> I submitted this patch sometime ago fixing issues with ne-trad and ne-rom.
> I am not sure if I followed correct procedure for this (I am sorry am new
> to this) can somebody please accept or comment on the comment on this.

I'm very sorry for not responding on that matter.  Somehow
your mail didn't reach me.  I've just read it on the web.

As the input methods ne-trand and ne-rom were contributed by
address@hidden, I added he/she in CC: of this mail.

As the comments says that both of them implements the input
methods published by MPP, if some mappings are different,
it's a bug.  But, it seems that the original input method
softwares are now maintained (and developped) by LTK.  So,
if the mappings were changed by LTK, we can't say that the
current mis-matchings are bugs of ne-rom.mim and
ne-trad.mim.  I don't know what actually happend.

Anyway, in the latter case, perhaps we should provide new
input methods ne-ltk-rom.mim and ne-ltk-trad.mim.  However,
if most Nepali users now use input methods maintained by
LTK, fixing the current one is better.

Santosh and Suyash, could you please discuss and decide what
is the right thing for Nepali users?

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden