[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:25:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jon Bright <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> If a no-sanity-checking option isn't viable (or is too hated), maybe
> we could at least look at a seriously-reduced sanity checking
> option? Do we really need to go three revs back?
Or is there some repeated sanity checking which wouldn't be too hard
to remove? (A timestamp of the last time a paranoid monotone
successfully ran on a repository, or something?) That wouldn't help
the initial experience of pulling from a big repository (although I
guess you could have the sending repository give an assurance of
sanity, if you could believe it).
Hmm. Sounds hard.
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.18, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.18, Olivier Andrieu, 2005/04/13
- [Monotone-devel] Sanity checking (Was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.18), Jon Bright, 2005/04/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Jon Bright, 2005/04/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Bruce Stephens, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Jon Bright, 2005/04/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Nathan Myers, 2005/04/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Sanity checking, Peter Simons, 2005/04/13
Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.18, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/12
[Monotone-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.18, Georg-W. Koltermann, 2005/04/13