[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'...
From: |
Timothy Brownawell |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'... |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:44:32 -0500 |
On 4/21/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <address@hidden> wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on 21 Apr 2005 08:55:04 -0700, Emile Snyder
> <address@hidden> said:
>
> esnyder> I see, you would also like to either remove the
> esnyder> accept_testresult_change() hook call, or redefine the default
> esnyder> to 'return true'?
>
> I forgot to mention that. Yes, I want to throw away that hook. When
> asking users to explicitely ask for true testresults, the hook is not
> interesting any more, at least from my perspective.
Perhaps the set of requested testresults could be recorded in
MT/options, like the chosen branch is?
Tim
- [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Emile Snyder, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Emile Snyder, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/21
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Bruce Stephens, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Emile Snyder, 2005/04/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Thoughts about 'testresult'..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/04/21