RE: [Monotone-devel] Re: Multiple private keys in 0.24

[John W. Terrell]

Bruce, thanks for the hook info, I didn't think of checking there.  I'll
put that into use now.  Is it possible to specify where the user's key
directory is located (specifically on Windows)?   If a user is using a
local profile but has their "my documents" relocated via a group policy,
their key files will reside on the local machine (which might not be
what they expect and won't know to back that up).   

Thanks!

-John

-----Original Message-----
From:
address@hidden
.org
[mailto:monotone-devel-bounces+john-keyword-monotone.4a150f=coolpeople.u
address@hidden On Behalf Of Bruce Stephens
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 3:00 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Monotone-devel] Re: Multiple private keys in 0.24

"John W. Terrell" <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all, I've seen prior posts about multiple private key handling
issues
> with the way 0.24 now handles them and I wonder if it might be a
> solution to have each database have a var that indicates what the
> current "private" key is.   I check into multiple databases using
> different private keys (different email addresses - this is by design)
> and it's a bit of a pain to have to specify the -k switch now when I'm
> commiting/syncing, etc.   This database var would only have the
current
> private key's ID (not the private key itself) so I wouldn't think
> there'd be any security issues (I could be wrong).

Currently you can put a key id into the MT/options file in a working
copy.  I'm not sure if that's documented, but it's been mentioned on
the mailing list several times.

You can also define a get_branch_key hook, which gives a key to be
used for a given branch.

Aren't those better than having it in a database?


_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel