Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: emacs monotone integration once more

[Justin Patrin]

On 4/30/06, Wim Oudshoorn <address@hidden> wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:19:40PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
>
> >> Also I do not have a lot of time to keep this up.  I mostly
> >> just fix things that annoy me in the most time efficient matter.
> >
> > Would you be interested in sticking it on the server at venge.net?
> > That way other people could easily contribute if they got the itch, as
> > well.  Do we have a key for you?
>
> That is fine with me.  But, at the moment there is one problem,
> I am using monotone 0.23 at the moment.
> I will convert to 0.26 or later soon, pending one issue I have
> with certificates in 0.26.  But I will detail that in another e-mail.
>
> Also I need to think about how to organize the synchronization.
> I don't want all of venge.net in my database and the otherway around,
> I don't want all of my database to end up in venge.net.
>
> So what I would like is to set up my database such that if I type
>
> mtn sync venge.net
>
> I will not send my private branches and not receive any branches
> I am not interested in.  The last is easy with the exclude pattern,
> but the first I do not really know how to.  Because
> when I type
>
> mtn sync my-other-machine
>
> I DO want a full synchronization.

I'm sure the venge.net server is set up only to allow net.venge
branches (well, I assume it is, I could be very wrong). Anyway I
suggest a simple shell alias. mtnsyncvenge or some-such which
explicitly states the branches you want to sync. (I personally use
pull and push aliases.)

--
Justin Patrin