Re: [Monotone-devel] A vote for propagation (debian branch)

[Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker]

In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:40:54 -0700, Nathaniel Smith 
<address@hidden> said:

njs> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:09:44PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker 
wrote:
njs> > I've been running a server as well as my local client using the
njs> > nvm.debian branch.  As far as I can tell, it works without flaw.
njs> > 
njs> > So I wonder, is there any reason not to propagate the changes
njs> > in that branch back to nvm?  If need be, that propagation has
njs> > my vote!
njs> 
njs> Do we have a debian maintainer right now?  This seems like their
njs> decision to make.

I'm not sure I agree.  We have most obviously chosen (well, I should
say "you" because that was already in place before my time) to support
Debian packaging, simply by starting the debian/ subdirectory and fill
it with the right files.  As a related thing, who's making decisions
regarding monotone.spec?

But it matters little, really, as long as *someone* decides.  I would
hate for it to end up with us and Debian pointing at each other and
saying "It's your decision" in chorus.  I much prefer to be pro-
active in this matter.  Therefore, I speak up.

It seems like Tomas Fasth came back into the game recently.  Tomas,
are you with us?  Ya got anything to say?

Cheers,
Richard

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis