[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC)
From: |
Alex Queiroz |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:44:02 -0300 |
Hallo,
On 7/13/06, Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> wrote:
"Alex Queiroz" <address@hidden> writes:
Sounds to me like the costs would outweigh the benefits for doing
that. But I guess I don't know the details of what you're doing.
I don't know what you think the costs may be. Lua was designed
for very easy interfacing with C (much easier than Python), so it was
utterly painless. And we won a lot in flexibility, such as putting
related test functions in different Lua modules and running only the
tests we want at a given time.
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
- [Monotone-devel] Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/06
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC),
Alex Queiroz <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/25