[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC)
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 2006 20:52:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alex Queiroz" <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> I don't know what you think the costs may be. Lua was designed for
> very easy interfacing with C (much easier than Python), so it was
> utterly painless.
Easier, but still not trivial. It's surely still four or five lines
per function?
(Amusingly, Python's *really* easy, if you use Boost.Python. It's a
frighteningly slick library. Not lightweight, though.)
> And we won a lot in flexibility, such as putting related test
> functions in different Lua modules and running only the tests we
> want at a given time.
Ah, OK. Yes, that's a neat thing to do, that can be tricky to do
without fiddling. I tend to think of "unit tests" as being tests that
run so fast that you don't need to worry about running a subset---just
run the whole lot. However, that's not universally the case (and for
monotone it's not).
- [Monotone-devel] Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/06
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Bruce Stephens, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC),
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Alex Queiroz, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Testsuite status (SoC), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/07/25