Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio extensions

[Jon Bright]

Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> But, this seems broken... if a process starts feeding us
> key/value arguments (for example), and we are an old monotone that
> does not understand them, then we will silently do something different
> than expected.  Worse, it's entirely possible that those arguments
> will include the character "l", at which point we will lose sync
> entirely...

In this case, isn't the process that didn't first call interface_version 
to find out what you're capable of more the one at fault?

--
Jon Bright
Silicon Circus Ltd.
http://www.siliconcircus.com