monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stu


From: Zack Weinberg
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:45:29 -0800

On 2/16/07, Justin Patrin <address@hidden> wrote:
Running these commands over PuTTY on my Gentoo system (from Windows) gives me:
address@hidden ~ $ echo "\xC2\xB7" | iconv -f UTF-8 -t
CP1252//IGNORE//TRANSLIT
\xC2\xB7
address@hidden ~ $ echo "\xC2\xB7" | iconv -f UTF-8 -t
ASCII//IGNORE//TRANSLIT
\xC2\xB7
address@hidden ~ $ echo "\xC3\x80" | iconv -f UTF-8 -t
CP1252//IGNORE//TRANSLIT
\xC3\x80
address@hidden ~ $ echo "\xC3\x80" | iconv -f UTF-8 -t
CP1252//IGNORE//TRANSLIT
\xC3\x80

Which I assume means that my shell is sending those strings in
straight instead of making them UTF-8.

Bourne shells do not interpret C-style \-escapes in double-quoted
strings, and whether or not "echo" interprets them is extremely
system-specific.  The "printf" shell builtin does interpret them,
though; try changing "echo" to "printf" and appending "\n" to all the
strings.

(Lapo: Please read up some on portability of Unix APIs at both the
shell and C level.  You are assuming over and over again that things
which work on your personal Linux box work everywhere.  It just isn't
so.)

zw




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]