Re: [Monotone-devel] branch globs

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 03:06:59PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> OK. I'm probably paranoid.
> But I always end up sync'ing to:
> {net.venge.monotone,net.venge.monotone.*}
> mainly to avoid the hypotetical and currently non-existing
> net.venge.monotone-sucks branch, which is of course included
> by the "usually suggested" net.venge.monotone* (w/o a dot).
> Should we need an operator that means either nothing or ".something"?

Hopefully the glob handling stuff will go away entirely with policy
branches, or at least we'll have a real branch hierarchy that it can
be sensitive to...?  (I.e, you may be straightening the picture frames
on the Titanic?)

-- Nathaniel

-- 
Eternity is very long, especially towards the end.
  -- Woody Allen