[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:11:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
On Sunday 25 February 2007, William Uther wrote:
> At the moment there doesn't seem to be any way of enforcing this
> 'single head on the central server' constraint.
That is on purpose. It's a very bad idea to hinder someone doing a push only
because this would produce divergence. There's nothing wrong with a branch
having multiple heads. In fact, in a distributed vc system like Monotone's,
you can often have that situation without even noticing (across the set of
all the distributed repositories).
Forbidding someone to do a push means forbidding him to make a backup of his
valuable work! Netsync's purpose is only to establish a consistent view
across all participating repositories, nothing more. If someone feels like
there should be only one branch head (which he can obviously not enforce
world-wide), he is always free to do a merge. Then again, he'll get as much
support from Monotone as possible.
- Thomas
pgpY_1p6tpgV_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?, William Uther, 2007/02/25
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Encouraging merges?, Lapo Luchini, 2007/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?,
Thomas Moschny <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?, Thomas Moschny, 2007/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?, Paul Crowley, 2007/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?, Timothy Brownawell, 2007/02/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Encouraging merges?, Nathaniel Smith, 2007/02/25