|
From: | Joel Crisp |
Subject: | [Monotone-devel] Thought on improving monotone perceived performance |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:53:13 +0100 |
It just occurred to me that most modern file systems provide a mechanism to monitor a tree of files for write activity. Would it make sense to provide a monitor for files under monotone control which would queue a changed file for a low prioirty background task. The task would then fingerprint it into a cache of current fingerprints? Then come a commit etc operation monotone could first check the cache of fingerprints and not have to recalculate them during the operation. Thoughts? Joel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |