Re: [Monotone-devel] Thought on improving monotone perceived performance

[Joel Crisp]

Odd, I didn't get it back.

Maybe gmail is doing some weird optimisation or something.

Does anyone have an opinion?

Joe

On 7/13/07, Thomas Keller <address@hidden> wrote:
> Joel Crisp schrieb:
> > It just occurred to me that most modern file systems provide a
> > mechanism to monitor a tree of files for write activity.
> >
> > Would it make sense to provide a monitor for files under monotone
> > control which would queue a changed file for a low prioirty background
> > task. The task would then fingerprint it into a cache of current
> > fingerprints?
> > Then come a commit etc operation monotone could first check the cache of
> > fingerprints and not have to recalculate them during the operation.
>
> I guess this message already came through on 7th of July...
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel/11563
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> only dead fish swim with the stream: http://thomaskeller.biz/blog
> Am Anfang war das Wort: http://www.schäuble-muss-weg.de
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monotone-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel