[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:35:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Stephen Leake wrote:
> Which means we probably should use two digits for the minor number;
> we'll probably have more than 10 backward-compatible changes before
> the next incompatible change.
This is generally not a problem if you use some sort of natural sorting order
for comparing revision numbers, so the parts before and after the dot are
compared separately.
- Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Stephen Leake, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Stephen Leake, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Keller, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Keller, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Moschny, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Stephen Leake, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Daniel Atallah, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Nuno Lucas, 2008/03/30
Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix,
Thomas Moschny <=