[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:44:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Saturday 29 March 2008 Thomas Keller wrote:
> Whether or not we're doing the cap.-bits thing it would surely be useful
> to define once and for all what should actually be an "incompatible
> change". I haven't heard much of the other voices yet on this issue.
One criterion could be, whether there exists (or could exist) any client using
that part of the interface in the "normal" way (as intended by the
interface's developers), that needs to be fixed to continue using that part.
This is - of course - very vague.
- Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Keller, 2008/03/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Stephen Leake, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Stephen Leake, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Keller, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Keller, 2008/03/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix,
Thomas Moschny <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Stephen Leake, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Daniel Atallah, 2008/03/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Nuno Lucas, 2008/03/30
Re: [Monotone-devel] interface version / command matrix, Thomas Moschny, 2008/03/28