Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0

[Markus Wanner]

Hi

Zack Weinberg wrote:
> What I think this calls for is a new cert type, which I'm going to
> call "voucher".  A voucher cert places a new-form signature on a
> particular set of old-form certs for a revision.  The data I think we
> need to sign is
> 
>   revision_id || ( cert_hash || old_keypair_id || new_keypair_hash )*

All of this reminds me of the atomic cert (or super cert) thingie.
Wouldn't that be the absolute perfect combination for a common flag day?
Well, despite the fact that we don't have atomic certs implemented... :-(

Regards

Markus Wanner