Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: new restrictions branch for including required parents

[Stephen Leake]

Derek Scherger <address@hidden> writes:

>> Other than that I think its ready to get merged - I suspect Stephe has
>> to make his undrop command equally use explicit_includes, just like
>> revert, right?
>>
>
> Yes that's probably correct. I haven't actually looked at that code to see
> what it shares with revert, but it probably needs a similar restriction
> change. Ideally there will be a test that fails (with too much getting
> reverted) until it isn't including parents. It looks like undrop has not
> been merged yet so we can fix it before it gets merged.
>
> I've merged the restriction changes in so we can see what needs to be done
> to undrop and I'll move on to the diff branch from the bugfest.

I merged undrop to main after this, and it looks ok; _all_ of revert is
shared with undrop, so undrop will just work.

-- 
-- Stephe