[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11
From: |
Markus Wanner |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 May 2014 16:36:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0 |
On 05/16/2014 03:28 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Unfortunately, it looks like squeeze is going to be picked for
> long-term support.
Squeeze currently ships monotone-0.48-3.
I don't think this affects build requirements of future releases of
monotone.
I agree it's an indicator that we better remain netsync compatible back
to (at least) 0.48.
> (Why, why, couldn't they haave picked wheezy for this?)
Quoting from your link: "Importantly, the success of Squeeze-LTS will be
used to judge the viability of LTS support for [wheezy and [jessie]." So
there's still hope.
Regards
Markus Wanner
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Rust to the World! [was: C++11], (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Rust to the World! [was: C++11], Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11,
Markus Wanner <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/16